In which context is 'intended for human consumption' correctly used?

The phrase 'intended for human consumption' is correctly used to mean a product can be eaten or drunk. This terminology specifically refers to any substance or product that is designed and approved for individuals to ingest in some form, whether that be eating solid food or drinking liquid.

This definition is particularly significant in the context of food safety regulations and standards, where substances intended for human consumption must meet certain health and safety criteria to ensure they are not harmful to individuals. For example, a cannabis-infused edible product would be classified under this definition, as it is specifically made to be consumed by people.

The other contexts do not align accurately with the established definition of 'intended for human consumption.' While some products may be sold (in the first context) or might be considered safe for inhalation (in the second context), these do not encapsulate the essence of being consumed in the traditional sense of eating or drinking. Likewise, stating that a product must be cooked first (the fourth context) implies an additional preparation step that is not inherently part of the definition concerning consumption. Therefore, the correct interpretation focuses on the act of eating or drinking.